But if it isn't breaking the consensus rules, then technically, it isn't an "exploit". Perhaps in your opinion it is, but it's debatable.
It is an exploit
when it is not the expected behavior and when it is using an oversight by the developers who left the validation rules loose.
That's precisely the point, it's debatable. Because other developers/users, and I'm not saying I necessarily agree with them, would consider it a "solution" to the problem "How do we bring NFTs and tokens in the Bitcoin blockchain". It might be an inefficient, inelegant "solution", but for them it's probably enough to build on.
they are not eve NFT
see how you have ben trained wrongly by your forum daddy..he made you beleive they are NFT
as for my trust rating GUESS WHO INSTIGATED it.. yep the crowd your forum daddy adores and cries to each time he is proven wrong
your like an idiot at school that asks the head teacher to talk to someone and then uses the teacher talking to them as an excuse as to why no one should listen to the truth because your crowd cry so much
how about stop crying when proven wrong and instead just learn bitcoin and use blockdata, an code .. instead of each others cries and hugs and ass kisses to back each other up
GROW UP, essentially