~snip~
Removing the KYC policy page won't make LeeBet a 'No-KYC' casino. LeeBet is a Curacao licensed casino and the identity verification requirement is still mentioned in the terms page (check the clause 5.2 and 9.3) of your casino.
So what is their point to say that they removed the KYC policy then if they still have the written terms that they reserve the right to ask identity verification?
Also, they reserve the right to revise and/or change their terms anytime so they claim today as No KYC casino by removing their KYC policy but they may also bring it back anytime when they want.
I feel what they have just announced here about removing KYC policy and claming to be NO KYC casino is just a prank because they still have the right to ask KYC anytime based on their terms.
I will not be surprised if there will be some players reported that they are asked to complete KYC in the future.
It will be impossible for any online casino (legal) with a valid license to erase the KYC/AML policies on their T&C, it will bring a real serious problem for them.
When there is a legal online casino state that there is no KYC on their platform then its up to us to decide whether to "trust" their words or not with a risk you can be asked to do a KYC anytime.
We all aware that this is one of marketing strategy to bring new users into the platform, some people might trust their words and some dont.
There are many better ways to promote the site to lift the platform reputation, no KYC statement is debatable and there is no legality of that.
what i believe is happening here is that there is no kyc for small deposits, like if your accumulated deposits is below 2000 euros. because most licensed casinos are not asking kyc for small time players with deposits/withdrawals below their minimum limit, let's say 2k USD or 2k euros.