And as i stated on different thread, not many people bother opening LN channel when it costs them several dollars to do so.
If you have a business that depends on making several Bitcoin transactions a day, and you're stuck in a high fee environment that appears to be prolonged, wouldn't it be more cost efficient to pay a really big fee once rather than several big fees for an indeterminate amount of time?
Several major exchanges will swap your BTC for LN or Liquid BTC for a zero % charge.
That's true, but i also expect not many Bitcoiner create lots of Bitcoin transaction. Aside from business, i expect only daily trader would take benefit from using LN.
I very much like the sarcasm of that guy.
What really irks me lately on this forum is some sheeple acceptance of everything, hundreds clapping for the rules, obey the rules, we must wait for the others to take a decision, a lot of fake unicorn farts drug induce stance where we should all act like sheep and wait peacefully while grassing out faith, not daring to come out and say: THIS IS F*** UP!
Because, we are all upset. I mean, who could have predicted that a wave of dumbasses would flow the mempool with gigabytes of crap images, deeming the on-chain transactions useless? I'm pretty confident we all expected Ordinals to have ended months now, but hey; it's close to a year and people still buy that nonsense. Unbelievable.
Rising the block size in a regulated manner to make this "confiscation" of block space more expensive sounds like a valid argument, but you were here in 2015-2017. Wanna repeat the era that gave birth to every failed fork of Bitcoin? I would rather not.
But aside from BCH, most other fork only join hype ride where people got excited from obtaining "free" forked coin.