You know, depending on how you look at it and how biased you are , one might think of this like:
Do you really want to let people chose again what they want, like in a 4 years cycle elections?
Depending on how you look at it, exactly. In my opinion, Bitcoin is more important than elections in democratic systems. If Bitcoin was democratic, we'd not only have to agree to a particular set of rules but also be
forced to use what the majority deems as right. "Screw majority", says bitcoin. You can opt-out anytime you want, and join another community, which is more oriented to your perspective on how the network should operate.
Back to your question. The people
do choose what they want, but not in the manner of traditional elections. It surpasses that system. Unlike in elections where a government mandates voting for one of the presented options and obliges compliance with the outcome, Bitcoin offers a more flexible approach.