Post
Topic
Board Meta
Topic OP
So I have an interesting problem.
by
philipma1957
on 29/12/2023, 17:47:08 UTC

Mixers were banned I ended my mixer ad today to be sure I was early.

I wanted to post  in services that I will rent signature and other spaces.

I read loyce's  and based my ad explaining I based it on his ad and I ask for advice.  He thought the format was not correct and that I needed to

change it or it could be plagiarism .

It is why I asked as I knew I should be able to require and say a few things as should anyone else selling their space.

So I rewrote the post.

here is new thread.


I will be available on Jan 1 2024. I would take BTC LTC or DOGE
I am renting my avatar, my signature and my text under my avatar.
All three for you.
With a two month minimum rental.


I usually post more than 80 posts a week closer to 400 posts a month.


Payment can be fixed in Bitcoin,LTC,Doge or dollars, but has to be in crypto.

I prefer to be paid upfront, but I'm flexible if I know you and trust you.


"I will be the person that decides to let you rent the 3 spaces or reject offers I don't like.

If the service I rented to is banned or turns into a scam,

I would  stop advertising it and possibly would not refund the advertisers payment."


I am the most well known name on bitcointalk sometimes the second most as theymos and I bounce up and down.
I have made over 44,000 posts.
I have 6063 + 1000 airdrop merits puts me in top 25
I have given  8251 merits also in the top 40
I am the most recognized.
I am very much trusted

Check screen shot. I am up there on every list.






Frankly I would like two month or more  deals as it is less work to advertise again and again.
As I said I had a 6 month prepaid deal that was ended due to mixers ending.
Since mixers are done and my signature and all spaces will be open for rent in 2024.


.


So look at the bold print part.

"I will be the person that decides to let you rent the 3 spaces or reject offers I don't like.

If the service I rented to is banned or turns into a scam,

I would  stop advertising it and possibly would not refund the advertisers payment."




and look at original


I only advertise services that I like. I reserve the right to reject offers I don't like. If the service I'm advertising turns into a scam, I reserve the right to stop advertising it without returning payment.
Original:
I only advertise services that I like. I reserve the right to reject offers I don't like. If the service I'm advertising turns into a scam, I reserve the right to stop advertising it without returning payment.


I did credit loyceV for his original in a different spot in the same post.  So I am not here to argue about format as I can see my credit for his post may not have been clear.


But rather than have hard feelings and arguments about formats. I am asking here essentially my new wording is a rewrite of LoyceV's idea but in a way  different.  Here is my rewrite Would this be good as it is not a copy and essentially any one renting their space should be able to qualify it.

"I will be the person that decides to let you rent the 3 spaces or reject offers I don't like.

If the service I rented to is banned or turns into a scam,

I would  stop advertising it and possibly would not refund the advertisers payment."



Let's pretend LoyceV wrote a perfect qualifying statement. anyone renting their own  space wants to use it.  How do they use it.

without being Called out for copying.


1) "Thou shall not kill".   A commandment must I credit it or can I say it.

2) A loan needs collateral. = A statement used by hundreds on this site.

Or a well written sentence from LoyceV:

"I only advertise services that I like. I reserve the right to reject offers I don't like. If the service I'm advertising turns into a scam, I reserve the right to stop advertising it without returning payment."   by LoyceV

But a very nice legal statement  that applies  to anyone renting their space.

It is why I did the original thread this way. 


So this is my replacement for that sentence.

"I will be the person that decides to let you rent the 3 spaces or reject offers I don't like.

If the service I rented to is banned or turns into a scam,

I would  stop advertising it and possibly would not refund the advertisers payment."




It is not the same, but close the biggest change is I said maybe I would not refund you the payor if I cancel.


BTW LoyceV it is a damn fine qualifier on your part.  And anyone on the forum should be able to use it if they are renting out  a space on

BiTCoinTalk.

Just a thread for thought on how hard it can be to work with plagiarism and what is correct or not correct.

Thoughts are welcome.