Mixers were banned I ended my mixer ad today to be sure I was early.
I wanted to post in services that I will rent signature and other spaces.
I read loyce's and based my ad explaining I based it on his ad and I ask for advice. He thought the format was not correct and that I needed to
change it or it could be plagiarism .
It is why I asked as I knew I should be able to require and say a few things as should anyone else selling their space.
So I rewrote the post.
here is new thread.
I will be available on Jan 1 2024. I would take BTC LTC or DOGE
I am renting my avatar, my signature and my text under my avatar.
All three for you.
With a two month minimum rental.
I usually post more than 80 posts a week closer to 400 posts a month.
Payment can be fixed in Bitcoin,LTC,Doge or dollars, but has to be in crypto.
I prefer to be paid upfront, but I'm flexible if I know you and trust you.
"I will be the person that decides to let you rent the 3 spaces or reject offers I don't like.
If the service I rented to is banned or turns into a scam,
I would stop advertising it and possibly would not refund the advertisers payment."I am the most well known name on bitcointalk sometimes the second most as theymos and I bounce up and down.
I have made over 44,000 posts.
I have 6063 + 1000 airdrop merits puts me in top 25
I have given 8251 merits also in the top 40
I am the most recognized.
I am very much trusted
Check screen shot. I am up there on every list.

Frankly I would like two month or more deals as it is less work to advertise again and again.
As I said I had a 6 month prepaid deal that was ended due to mixers ending.
Since mixers are done and my signature and all spaces will be open for rent in 2024.
.
So look at the bold print part.
"I will be the person that decides to let you rent the 3 spaces or reject offers I don't like.
If the service I rented to is banned or turns into a scam,
I would stop advertising it and possibly would not refund the advertisers payment."and look at original
I only advertise services that I like. I reserve the right to reject offers I don't like. If the service I'm advertising turns into a scam, I reserve the right to stop advertising it without returning payment.
Original:
I only advertise services that I like. I reserve the right to reject offers I don't like. If the service I'm advertising turns into a scam, I reserve the right to stop advertising it without returning payment.
I did credit loyceV for his original in a different spot in the same post. So I am not here to argue about format as I can see my credit for his post may not have been clear.
But rather than have hard feelings and arguments about formats. I am asking here essentially my new wording is a rewrite of LoyceV's idea but in a way different. Here is my rewrite Would this be good as it is not a copy and essentially any one renting their space should be able to qualify it.
"I will be the person that decides to let you rent the 3 spaces or reject offers I don't like.
If the service I rented to is banned or turns into a scam,
I would stop advertising it and possibly would not refund the advertisers payment."Let's pretend LoyceV wrote a perfect qualifying statement. anyone renting their own space wants to use it. How do they use it.
without being Called out for copying.
1) "Thou shall not kill". A commandment must I credit it or can I say it.
2) A loan needs collateral. = A statement used by hundreds on this site.
Or a well written sentence from LoyceV:
"I only advertise services that I like. I reserve the right to reject offers I don't like. If the service I'm advertising turns into a scam, I reserve the right to stop advertising it without returning payment." by LoyceV
But a very nice legal statement that applies to anyone renting their space.
It is why I did the original thread this way.
So this is my replacement for that sentence.
"I will be the person that decides to let you rent the 3 spaces or reject offers I don't like.
If the service I rented to is banned or turns into a scam,
I would stop advertising it and possibly would not refund the advertisers payment."It is not the same, but close the biggest change is I said maybe I would not refund you the payor if I cancel.
BTW LoyceV it is a damn fine qualifier on your part. And anyone on the forum should be able to use it if they are renting out a space on
BiTCoinTalk.
Just a thread for thought on how hard it can be to work with plagiarism and what is correct or not correct.
Thoughts are welcome.