If we stick to this notion of "you dislike how things currently operate, you go else where" this means there is nothing more to discuss on bitcoin, we use it as is, and wait for everyone to be a millionaire.
Again, sad interpretation. Rather, if you dislike how things operate, you have two choices:
- Confirm your rationale by talking about it. Propose change. Convince other individuals you are right. Convince developers you are right, or write the code that implements your vision yourself.
- Go elsewhere.
But people talking about big blocks are not trying to impose anything, they know neither you nor them can change the rules, they are just having a conversation
This conversation is so extensively discussed over the years, that it has lost its intellectual spirit. Now more it is just utter complaining. Complaining about what the developers
should have done; what they
should be writing. People have to move on. Tomorrow, it'll be 2024 and we are talking as if it's still 2017.
Those are discussing an ongoing "issue" in Bitcoin , telling them to go use BSV as if you think they don't know that already is pretty funny
Oh, but I am very much aware they know it. What is questionable is whether they recognize it as the mature option. In my opinion, migrating to a community that respects your standards is more preferable than continually complaining about the deficiencies of your current community.
How do you know? What if I point to a person who is a better coder than the average core dev and still wants bigger blocks?
In that case, he will be given the two choices presented above.
I think I have already answered the rest of your questions.