Would you consider it censorship to make it impossible to carry out a transaction where the fee is higher than the overall sum (which would mechanically prevent BRC20 inscriptions) ?
the use of the word censorship is overly abused.. without any context of understanding of the word
when in contrast core dev love the words
eviction, rejection, drop, abandon, pruning, banning
bitcoin always had policies to not allow certain transactions/data..
.. in recent years they relaxed the rules which ended up with more junk. not a better system
And is it technically feasible to make it impossible to carry out a transaction where the fee would be higher than the overall sum (which would mechanically prevent BRC20 registrations) ?