So Boiling it down to Bitcoin and banks, actually the existence of Bitcoin has greatly improved the mindset of people especially on investment diversification such as profits making because is obvious that any money we put or save on the bank will not yield any profit so instead of people saving much money on the bank when there is a great opportunity offered by Bitcoin to channel all our money with the possibility of making or multiplying our capital in the future.
This is the reason the banks are against Bitcoin, the banks can't compete with Bitcoin. It's also among the reasons why the government are against Bitcoin. The government uses the banks as their institutions to control people through their money so if that privileges get taken aways from the banks, the government becomes powerless. But instead of the banks fighting Bitcoin they would have been looking forward ways to still be a part of the new revolution which is Bitcoin.
Centralized means of operation is something we can't just stop so if the banks were a little bit wiser and not hostile they should be building platforms to operate Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency transaction through creating exchanging services or other service like wallets and payment processor, that's a way the banks would have been part of the new industry but instead of that, they're busy fighting the industry thinking they can subdue it.
So perhaps do you guys think the reason why most countries are having some restrictions on Bitcoin is because of the effects it has on the bank that people prefer to invest there funds on Bitcoin instead of banks?.
It's inevitable that Bitcoin will make the banks absolute and the only thing the banks can do is to look for a way they can benefits too from Bitcoin dominance. Bitcoin was created as an alternative and if the banks play their cards right they can keep it that way instead of allowing Bitcoin take over all payments system