I hardly have read casino reviews; I don't use any unknown casinos TBH. Bitcointalk always remains the best source of information for me when picking up a casino. Nevertheless, I found gamblingbro.com as the best casino review as they want to give a better insight and real experience to their audience. Take an hour or two to check them out. Since they don't use any affiliate links (I guess), they are unlikely to be biased while writing a review for any casino.
I just had a look at your platform and read one review. TBH, it seems you are just another casino review platform with nothing different or unique information. That's where GamblingBro has some creativity and advantages over other casino review platforms.
This forum is indeed the best place for you to seek off with those informations that we are really that tending to seek off on which it would really be just that be worth because we do see that comments and suggestions or reactions of people out of this forum are really that real and not something biased but of course you should see on a specific user whether he could be trusted or not but in overall when community feedbacks do really give out on the same sentiment then it would be that safe to presume or assuming out that the information is really that legit. This is why im not really that a fan of reading up review sites.
If ever there would really be those review sites then the most common preference that we wanted to see is into those review sites which arent biased and having those good way on reviewing specially in depth review ones into those casinos that they are trying out to feature. People would be finding out to be odd if ever there would really be some shit review.
Lots of gambling disputes have been solved in this forum and people are most thankful for the gambling assistance gotten in bitcointalk. Any member who began reading reviews on the forum wouldn't look out for other review sites, which may delay their complaints or research on a specific casino. The responses in the forum are quite a wide range and members are vast in terms of gambling-related discussions. Review sites only provide some specific information which makes it easier for a reader to understand a casino's TOS. But, I noticed that most review writers don't check the casinos and play games there to make better feedback like how long withdrawal takes and the possibilities of winning on the casino. They only write based on what is written in the casino's terms of service. Which doesn't make review sites interesting than what we could get in the forum. Members who talk about a specific casino, have used it, know its flaws and downside, how long it takes for the term to send a withdrawal, etc. Readers can also read about the previous issues the casino had, and if the gambler's money was later on resolved.
Most of these complaints and inner disputes can't be found on review sites, hence Op could use the opportunity to add on his review sites the functional aspect of the casino. If he's not ready to try out all the casinos before writing a review, then he can check in the forum or other review sites with a discussion page available to know users' complaints on the specific casino. What could lead to a person's money being seized and all that is what attracts readers to a review site, because it's the common problem in most casinos? Hardly have I seen a casino review site, offering in-depth research on a casino, what is all over the site is the outer sketch of the casino. Whether it's been active for long or not, the withdrawal method, customer service, etc. One can use the casino's TOS page to gain better information than what the review writer has on his page. Which shouldn't have been, like that.