I try to be unbiased, but just as we can't put all actions performed by world organizations and known lobbyists into one and the same basket labelled "attack on bitcoin" we also can't do the opposite and put them all in the basked labelled "conspiracy theories with no proof."
The most basic rule of every investigator is that the person who benefited from the crime might be involved in it and there's a bunch of organizations that can benefit from destroying bitcioin. The list includes the WEF, World Bank and a number of central banks. Also, it would be profitable for all parties involved in trading gold and the ones involved in designing CBDCs.
First of all , to decide if something is an attack you have to look at the evidence . There's no evidence connecting any of those entities with the "destruction" of btc . If there's any kindly point me to it , i'd be more than happy to change my view if
serious evidence exist .
But i won't stand with opinions of people that bring nothing to the table other than pure imagination . And that's what cryptosize does , not to mention that he always avoids the obvious if it doesn't fit his narratives .