There is nothing pointing towards anything obvious. To me, it did not seem like he was replying to the OP because he stated: "
That is insane. Terrible news and terrible decision.Whoever is arguing in favor of it is effectively a government censorship and anti-privacy shill". It seemed his comment was directed more towards a recent post (hence the question).
I doubt he would return to the forum after more than two years of absence to call theymos an anti-privacy shill and call him someone who is advocating for government censorship, that is I asked him who he was replying to.
Which post you are replying to?
He is obviously replying to theymos announcement. When generally replying to the original post, no need to quote it.
You are an entertainer LOL
When generally replying to the original post, no need to quote it.
General sense, isn't it?
So I guess it's illegal to have a BTC full node... I wonder why the authorities have done nothing about it.
You must be joking. Bitcoin survived 1.5 half decade. They could not do anything.