[...]
And the answers to the questions.None, that's why I asked, that's the whole point of my question. There wasn't an allocation for team on your paper [
archived], and then they suddenly share allocation with early investors because... you decided it to be that way?
I don't understand where you saw the allocation of tokens for the Team?
The team members are early investors like everyone else (they only invest their time).
If you buy out all the MAGIO tokens intended for early investors today, there will be no new tokens for the Team.
Does it mean other part in the tokenomy also subjected to changes the way you will them?
Let's be honest - if we think it's better for the project, yes, we can change the tokenomics. But I don't see any reason to do that. Tokenomics is fine.
You might want to look for the definition of "volunteer".
Thanks, I know it.
Quoted in full for reference.
Now, where do I saw the allocation for the team? Nowhere in your tokenomy, and that's the problem and the question here, because later on, apparently the early investors allocation are now allocated for team, as per your own statement. If you argue that team members are early investors that invest their time, then allocate some fund for them
from the very beginning instead of taking it from what's intended for other category. Seems like a bad planning, is it not?
And regarding changing the tokenomy "if we think it's better for the project", how many people is in this "we", again?