I looked at all the topics of this author, and i can say that this is another slander against a competitor. It seems that the owner of this website has provided 10 times more substantiated materials than the author of this topic.
It is clearly visible here that apart from empty words, the author did not write anything in the form of evidence. I do not exclude that 1 of the author’s topics may not be related to slander, but this particular topic is completely slander.
Uhh... you do aware that the owner of the site admitted that he "stretched the truth", use fake profile as their customer service, and have fake reviews? And the numbers they gave on their site are most likely "stretched truth" too. Even if the author of this thread did not provide evidence [though the evidence and findings regarding this site are quite abundant, given by many users who pitched in], there is a written statement by the owner of the site admitting his... stretched truth
"Stretching the truth" does not mean scam. Of course, fake reviews are not good, but this does not mean that the website is fake. I use this website, however, they work very slowly, but they don’t scam people, unlike Bitcoadvice. But agree that when launching a website, almost everyone uses both exaggerated numbers and paid reviews to somehow promote their website in such a competitive environment. So, dear, there is no need to say that the owner of the website accepted the accusations of the author of the topic, but simply honestly admitted something else.
do? And you seemed to forgot to justify the fact that they use fake photo for their live support. What's the good excuse for this? Certainly a project that's built in a good faith, no matter how new they are, will not try to fool people with fake photo?