LMAO, you're an interesting one, aren't you? You continue on contradicting yourself. First you don't have an allocation for your team, and then you decided to share the early investors pre-sale token with the team because they are "early investors" [paid in time] upon being asked if the tokenomy changed, and after talking in circles, you said that it was the plan from the beginning, and now, when asked why doesn't it show dedicated allocation for team, you said as quoted above.
We're walking in circles.
a) we don't have separate tokens for the team (and never have);
b) for us, the team is the same investors (and it has been so from the very beginning).
This may be unusual for you, but it's true.
Actually, I'll beg to differ and say that the process of making decision of changing tokenomy shouldn't be internal or even happening at all. You ask for a funding here through token sale, it is very unethical to change your business proposal, the one that people use as one of their consideration to invest in your project by buying your token, unilaterally through your internal team's decision, i.e. because you deemed it fit. It doesn't evoke much confidence at all, does it? If it has to happen, it should be through your community agreement.
In fact, we do not even request any financing and do not make any business proposal, but inform the community about our project (including the opportunity to purchase tokens before the release of the game at a big discount).
Firstly, we are looking for those who will be interested in playing the game. We will listen to the opinions of users, but we will make the final decisions on how to develop the project ourselves. With all due regard.
There are no plans to change the tokenomics of the project and never have been. We will stick to what is described in the documentation.
But there is always a small chance that conditions will change and what is relevant now will become irrelevant in the future. We will respond to such challenges.