I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.
Not all of them are biased or paid for, but I reckon that there is a point on the issue of of who evaluates the evaluator on this. It is a question of having some of the users sign off a review, so the rest may know who is behind the result of backing the review. Older users, well known in the forum or with good reputation are a sign for those looking for a solid review, non-paid.
Just like for example BTCGOSU which we do know that its owner or creator is one of the known and reputable member of this forum on which we can really assure about its legitimacy or precision
when it comes to gambling site reviews and even on having some guides on which it is really that something worth to look upon. You could really be able to tell that when it comes to reviews
then there's overall transaparency and accuracy into those things mentioned on which it is really that hard to ignore that those are good reviews which it would really be worth to read up
if you are that someone whose really that loving on reading up some site reviews but most of the time, people doesnt really care on reading up reviews as long they would be just simply stick
into those known and reputable ones then theyre good to go.