I agree and also want to add why Chelsea cannot maximize the abilities of its players due to Pochettino limited strategy. True or not but so far when players cannot show their abilities then the main problem is with the coach. However the coach will be the main source of criticism before commenting on his players performance. In my opinion this is a challenge in itself for Pochettino who is faced with club management, sometimes Chelsea can be suitable when facing tough opponents but after this victory it is no longer visible against lower level clubs. This means that there is still a gap between the strategy and the trainer's way of approaching it.
What is the point of blaming Pochettino for Chelsea's poor results now, he has to work with those players who remained in the team, he did not receive funding, but was faced with a large outflow of players.
I don’t know what the reason was, perhaps it was Pochettino’s initiative, but in any case, I very much doubt that with this squard there is any point in counting on any satisfactory results for this team.
Chelsea have always been a team with a lot of money, and this is what has given them the opportunity to be a competitive team, and attract the best players. This time everything is happening differently, I don’t know why this is so, maybe this is some kind of experiment, or maybe Bowley doesn’t want to invest a lot of money at this stage. But without this, it will be impossible to achieve results in the Premier League.