Bitcoadvice (OP) has the following websites through which he commits fraud:
1. coinchangers.net
2. coinchanger.live
3. coinchanges.net
4. coin-changer.net
5. coinchanger.net
I can confidently say that he opened and manages all these sites, he is deceiving people, and he is trying to close all new cryptocurrency exchange websites so that as many people as possible use his websites and become victims. That is, all new websites reduce its profits through a fraud scheme.
This is interesting, I just took a glance here and there, so I can't be sure I grasp the whole situation, but I believe you have something as an evidence to back up this claim? Otherwise, I think it's... slander.
In terms of fake support photos, of course, this is very bad for user relations, I do not deny this. I understand, of course, that this is dishonest, but with all due respect, this does not make the website fake, as the author wrote in the topic. I think it's a stupid marketing ploy, but it's not a scam. The author of the article himself is involved in fraud and thinks that all the business people are like him. Try to understand that if a person replaces photographs of support workers, then he should be called in other words, and not a scammer. If this causes inconvenience to someone, then let them write and ask for real photos, and there is no need to call them a scammer.
What does it make the website and the owner, then? An identity thief? I think there is a law prohibiting people using other people's credential as their own?
Of course have. Here is the link to his profile on GitHub:
https://github.com/Yandex41I looked, they even deleted/blocked this profile already. On GitHub he wrote copies of messages from this forum 1 in 1 and also asked to exclude some of these domains from blacklists:
1. coinchangers.net
2. coinchanger.live
3. coinchanges.net
4. coin-changer.net
5. coinchanger.net
In the Google archives there are still some pages on GitHub where the user Yandex41 participates and which 1 in 1 provides texts from this forum and inserts links from this forum that he himself wrote.
Also on this forum (Some examples:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5475616.0 ,
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5479174.0 ), several topics talk about his connection with these scam domains. I didn’t come up with this connection out of myself.
-----
Regarding personal data, I am only in favor of finding such people and bringing them to justice. Of course, I don’t know if they have an agreement with these users, or specifically what kind of violations there are, but I repeat, this is either a stupid marketing ploy, or perhaps a violation of the rights of other people. But since I don’t know the essence and there are no specific complaints from these individuals, I cannot call this site a scam.