I never read casino reviews. I think all these reviews are biased because they are paid. But maybe I'm wrong. And if I want to play in a casino, I just go to the site and try everything I like, I do not need to read the review. I can only give one piece of advice to those who write casino reviews, make them as short as possible. I like short reviews.
All review websites, not just casinos, currently lack the trust of their readers. Because, we all know, many companies use review websites that pay influencers or fake accounts to provide positive reviews of a company. However, sometimes even though they are paid, influencers provide neutral reviews of the company, they can even provide critical reviews, this is actually good, because it will be more organic. If everyone gives positive reviews, it seems hard to believe. However, that doesn't mean I'm against reviews. The Bitcointalk forum is a place for me to see organic reviews of new casinos that join the forum and more trusted since review from users is real, even we can find some of paid review, many criticized given by members, that why here I can find a realistic reviews from every companies.
I believe when the ops mentioned reviews here in thos context meant forum reviews and not any other form of third parties review sites, this is exclusively why we make some references to what we expected to see from those who constantly post and make reviews for casinos.
One of the features that members have made reference to mostly is the issues of withdrawal and deposits, and how fast the casino is with taking care of issues as their arises along the way, for a perfectly made reviews, their must contain some elements of what have been mentioned above to satisfy gambler's desire of what their expect to see from a casino.