I assume you read what I wrote in the paragraph, but did not read the substance that was quoted. Let me reiterate:
I read all. But apparently you do not get the substance of my post:
The whole concept of suffering is a human one. It is not permissible to judge the "subjective plant reality" based on concepts from subjective human reality (note that I do not use the term "subjective" to imply consciousness in a human sense). There's no way to infer that similarity or dissimilarity makes killing wrong in one case (animals) but right in another case (plants).
That plants do not have a nervous system comparable to animals is of zero relevance to the whole argument.
My last point
Most food plants are cultivated (ill-breeded, genetically mutilated and grown in unnatural habitats) only to serve human consumption.
was not refuted.
ya.ya.yo!