Re: UNREAL!! Sportsbet.io pays out a $42,000,000 USDT Casino WIN!!
Usually these players are sponsored by the casino. Especially if there happens to be a "replay" available, signalling that the play was recorded (which isn't done for no reason).
Several casino game software providers have a replay option available. It is even referenced as such in the OP:
Apologies and thanks for clarifying, I read and understood "watch the replay" as if if were recorded manually.
That is the real question.
The casino being in touch with the provider, the provider paying the $42m or the casino having $42m on hand and happily paying it out, it's all very unlikely to naturally happen in a week of time...let alone, like you said, the stringent KYC a real winner would go through for much less.
I think that it's more probable that the casino, the provider and the player are in cahoots, than this player genuinely having been spinning with their own money and winning this amount. It's in the provider's interest to pay a fake winner than a real one. It's in the casino's interest for advertising like we see now. It's in the player's interest since they probably got a wad of cash to play until hitting the jackpot...that is, if the player isn't the casino itself.
Conspiracy? Yes. We can't prove these things. However even looking at the OP, the coincidental recording of the happening, the logic of real logistics, it validates the opinion's validity.
The casino being in touch with the provider, the provider paying the $42m or the casino having $42m on hand and happily paying it out, it's all very unlikely to naturally happen in a week of time...let alone, like you said, the stringent KYC a real winner would go through for much less.
I think that it's more probable that the casino, the provider and the player are in cahoots, than this player genuinely having been spinning with their own money and winning this amount. It's in the provider's interest to pay a fake winner than a real one. It's in the casino's interest for advertising like we see now. It's in the player's interest since they probably got a wad of cash to play until hitting the jackpot...that is, if the player isn't the casino itself.
Conspiracy? Yes. We can't prove these things. However even looking at the OP, the coincidental recording of the happening, the logic of real logistics, it validates the opinion's validity.
Looking at this thread, you are asking a very legitimate question, and yet, like a herd of sheep, 90% of the posts here are "Wow" or "Congratulations". Herd of sheep?
Speechlesss
I agree with you that it's amazing that some believed Steve's story as given. It was like a herd of sheep. I searched for USDT transactions on the blockchain. Then looked for media with a Sportsbet jackpot and came up empty except what was being spread on Sportsbet's socials
Quote
Sportsbet.io pays out a $42,000,000 USDT Casino WIN!
Then I searched WowPot. The player did hit a WowPot at Sportsbet. Many casinos are involved in WowPots. Sportsbet did not pay the player since it's paid by Games Global.
Quote
GAMES GLOBAL PAYS OUT RECORD €38.5 MILLION THROUGH WOWPOT! JACKPOT
https://www.gamingintelligence.com/products/casino/185955-games-global-pays-out-record-e38-5-million-through-wowpot-jackpot/This is my first time on hearing out that those providers would really be the ones who would really be paying up the jackpot.
This is really something a once in a lifetime hit for sure by those individuals on which we are still starting for this year and it did really end up good for him or very very good considering
multimillions that had been able to gain or won. I cant just imagine that this guy do make out $50 on each roll into that slot.
Well, luck would really be always the main factor and this could really be indeed a life changing thing.
You would hope that as a business, they are generating much more than this as a profit to make the payout.
The best way to prove the transaction is with the blockchain....we see market manipulation every day, publicity like this needs to be backed by blockchain evidence to stop people from being (rightfully) skeptical.