Sometimes people are always addicted to playing gambling online and this has made them loss alot of funds, due to always topping up theire casino account with there debit card when they loose. and this usually makes them exhaust all there funds.
While those people playing offline in casino halls play with only the little money they have at hand, and that will reduce the risk of over spending. So now my question is this
Playing online or offline gambling which is more preferable in terms of risk reduction?
Do you think that before there were online casinos, gamblers did it in offline casinos and no one was addicted? If online casinos are more risk for people to be addicted then the government will be able to quickly find a solution so that its citizens don't get addicted, namely only allowing offline casinos and closing online casinos, why don't they do that? because both have the same portion to make gamblers risk to addicted.
Online casinos are just the implementation of technology so that people can gamble without having to leave their homes so it becomes simpler, but offline and online are both damaging if they are not done responsibly and do not have limits that are applied as limits so that they will stop when they reach that limit, so nothing can reduce the risk because gamblers have their own preferences, whether they prefer offline or vice versa.