Not really. You can be a mindless shitposter and still make a decent income thanks to the fact that there are more spots in signature campaigns than there are quality members.
Who is to blame for that? The campaign managers who allow such users on their campaigns? Or to the posters who enjoy generating shit because they can make money for their spam? I would say it's the campaign manager. Stake generates massive spam in this forum allowing negative tagged users to their campaign. They ignore the neutral tag that was left for shit posting (actmyname feedback). Recently another manager started allowing such posters in their campaign.
Either the manager have to be forum friendly, or the forum have to be more strict. Stake recently launched another signature campaign for Sr members only which means more money for spammers. Some campaigns does not have earned merit requirements. Stake encourage account buy/sells by doing that.