Sounds a bit vague in terms of the 4 supposed members who supposedly do not deserve merits for some or all of their posts. Maybe you can name the names of these merit recipients who supposedly did not deserve merits for their posts.... to the extent that your ongoing whining on such topic even matters?
I took you off ignore to do you the courtesy of at least replying to your question and was relieved to see you hadn't written a novel.
I didn't want to mention them by name. After all, I'm not a cruel or tacky person at heart, even if shitcoining is my main game.
But something I discovered today left me flabbergasted:
BitVest sig campaigners are getting paid to post in the WO.
They are, AFAIK, the only campaign that pays for such posts, in that they have no clause that says posts in places where the signature isn't displayed won't be counted.
So they aren't just posting in the WO to collect merits from you, knowing you are by far the forum's loosest merit source.
They are also getting paid for it!Also I just want to point out that this clause doesn't seem to be enforced, whatsoever:
2. Signature Spamming that is detrimental to the discussions in threads will not count as payment. If you're reported or caught for spamming you'll be removed from this campaign after 2 strike.
Several campaign members have been tagged as spammers already and their posts deleted.
Just dumb AF. Stop incentivizing them with merits. If you insist on doing that, do it elsewhere.