This challenge looks easy, but in reality it is very hard to recognize since there are around 5000 different slots on the platform. Dont think this is some top slot, as it wont be interesting and exciting to guess it. However, people managed to recognize it quickly, its the game called Oxygen. With challenges like this, I wonder if people play fair and really are that good at guessing the slot, or they use some kind of anti-blur software.
I also thought about the possibility that the winners were using some software, but when I participated in these contests I didn't see the same people constantly getting it right, it seemed more like random people who won, so I started to think that the winners are very lucky people. but I confess that at the beginning of this contest I spent many minutes watching each game to see which of the games could correspond to the photo and I couldn't get it right because the image was very blurry, I even thought that it was impossible for anyone to get it right, but when I saw that there were people who got it right, so I started to wonder what the hell they did to get it right
As they never ask the winner a question about how he manages to get it right, they probably don't ask him that question because it is part of the winner's privacy and his right to hide his tricks, so it is difficult to know what the trick is to get this contest right. . As I never got it right, I ended up giving up participating in this contest. It always left me thinking about what the trick was, I tried researching many, many games to get this image right, but it was useless. The guys who win in these contests are people with great observation skills. I couldn't even see anything in these images
I am not good at blurry contest either. I can only guess if the celebrity is blurred, and even then it has to be someone really popular. This contest looks a bit weird to me. I see that Roobet did not selected the first one to post as a winner (or maybe I am checking this fact incorrectly). I see that a lot of people in the comments spam with correct answer. Each tweet get around 10-12k views, and around 200-300 replies. Some of them are spam, some wrong predictions, some are correct. Lets take roughly 100 correct answers from 10-12k views (and there are those who just read tweet and scroll down). That is maybe 1%. Isnt it a lot when there are almost 5k slots to check, and the correct answer was given 2h after tweet was posted? That is why I though some software was in use.