I really don't understand why Daniele De Rossi has to be Mourinho's replacement. Because as far as I know, Daniele De Rossi also didn't produce good results in his first career as a coach at SPAL, a club in Serie C group B. But yes, young coaches can sometimes make surprises. For example, Arteta surprised us all in the Premier League.
Maybe being AS Roma coach is a great honor for Daniele De Rossi. This will be his first experience as a coach at a big club. And Daniele De Rossi actually has long experience as a player at AS Roma for 18 years. But I still doubt whether it will be a good thing for Roma or the opposite.
I also didn't really understand what happened
and I don't understand why they blame the coach ( I don't like Jose Mourinho) since they didn't spend enough money to strengthen the team
these actions really make me laugh a lot, meh
Unfortunately it's fashionable to blame the coach
Well I kind of understand why everyone actually likes to blame the coach. Because in most of the cases, I think people actually believes that the players are generally capable of doing very well, so it must be the fault of the coach. But Guess I think the coach was not that bad. I believe if he was given enough money or maybe more money, he could have definitely done a lot better. But let's say that the coach was not doing good enough. Why did they bring in De Rossi? I literally do not see any reason for that. Did they think that the result is going to get better with him? I definitely do not think so. I think they have to bring in a better coach.