Friends let's do small judiciary work and legal advice this morning. A woman was accused of killing her husband, his body was never found and she was sentenced. Years after serving her jail term, she found out the man is living with another woman.
She went and shot the man several times and he died for real this time around and she was re-arrested for the same murder on the same person.
As a judge what will you do ?
will you address the case as a fresh murder or will you consider it as a crime she already served the term?
lawyers, your opinion is needed. Over to you
The first question to this case is that, if she was wrongly accused for killing the man and she has served her jail term and come back, and it was later found out that the man was not dead, it then means she will be compensated by the judicial authority or the government for wrong accusation and haven't serve a jail term she's not supposed to, however if that case is settled on the compensation side on wrong accusation, then another case is going to be being opened on the fact that the man wasn't dead and she went ahead in killing the man in real time, it is a fresh case all together, because it is believed that the first case has been settled and compensations have been made.