Yeah, this is the site I was talking about. Thanks! Now, we are contending not only with ordinary Satoshis bearing collectibles or rare inscriptions but also with Satoshis that are considered rare themselves notwithstanding their ordinary inscriptions.

I'm now wondering about Bitcoin's fungibility because Satoshis themselves have sort of individual identities. It seems they aren't absolutely identical and therefore interchangeable because a Satoshi that passed through Satoshi himself/herself/themselves or Hal Finney, or Satoshis that were part of Bitcoin's earliest and historical transactions like the Laszlo purchase, could be deemed more precious or valuable, at least from a certain standpoint. A fork is nothing special but if it is the particular fork that Napoleon Bonaparte used in his last meal, that's probably special.