I have no intention of either using their services or recommending them. They literally destroyed their reputation with their own hands over something that was not even necessary.
Probably a good call to avoid using services like this unless you have to. Even then, it's a clear risk, especially after reading this thread. The problem seems to me like it stems from people trying to use these exchanging services as if they were mixers, which they are not. For someone operating a service like this and wanting to keep it running, I could see why they'd start at least trying to make sure that dirty funds aren't being laundered through this service. This is also a good demonstration of how 1 BTC does not equal 1 BTC. Not over time, not any time. It is a shame though. How long before censorship creeps into blockchain software...