I don't know what you mean by "A user is not warned from reusing an address", Satoshi very clearly warned that a new address should be used for each transaction
Avoiding my point, as usual.
Completely irrelevant and debunked already:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5471645.msg63120005#msg63120005.
If you never calculated the Boltzmann score, then why did you claim the Boltzmann score for a WabiSabi coinjoin is "worse"?
Because it makes a splash. Whirlpool has maximized the entropy, whereas in Wasabi there is address reuse, possible input and output collaborators, merges-- all of which would reduce the overall entropy.
At this point, I'm putting you back on ignore, because we're going on cycles, and you simply want to just say the last word. There is nothing constructive that I can make out of you.