my "model" as you call it punishes the few spammers/bloaters whilst everyone gets rewarded for not bloating/spamming
Except of the merchants that want to convert their bitcoin to fiat immediately, or to the general populace that does Child-Pays-For-Parent. But who cares, franky1 policies FTW!
you just dont want the junk to stop and you dont want spammers punished and you dont want everyone else getting cheaper fee's because it harms your desires that everyone should move over to your preferred subnetwork.
Nope. I just want equal treatment across the userbase. BTW, this "1-conf penalty" is probably one of the worst solutions, because it can be easily bypassed. Spammers can create UTXOs in different blocks beforehand, so that they can avoid the penalty.
Example:
- Create UTXO A in block 800001
- Create UTXO B in block 800002
[...]
- Create UTXO Z in block 800026
The spammer now wants to create UTXO A', so they spend UTXO A without penalty. While they do their regular "spam", they create new UTXOs simultaneously that are planned for future use, while they can spend B, C, D etc. on their next transactions.