but at the same time, there is a trade off currently, when we have some people who are very poor, and if they are buying $10 of bitcoin at a time, I hardly know how they can do that onchain without causing problems for themselves in the future, and if you are proposing BIG blocks to resolve it, that does not seem to be a tradeoff that is going to fly with a lot ofbitcoiners in order to achieve consensus, for reasons that I largely already discussed.
seems rather then reading what i actually talk about you prefer to grab the scripted narrative of the joke that is "bigblocker"
the stupid narrative that tries to quash any progress by going to insane extremes and pretending the extremes are whats being proposed
yet actual progressive proposals are not extremes.. but instead SCALINGs
Ok. Let us just take it for granted that I do not sufficiently understand what you are proposing to change, and I am saying that until any changes are made, each of us should be striving to figure out our own ways of dealing with uncertainties in current fees and future fees. If we cannot be sure about if various changes in the direction that you are suggesting to be "not extremes" yet we cannot take if for granted that such changes are going to happen.. unless you are talking about a variety of changes that have already been coded and are being considered for possible integration.
I also would consider this thread to be aimed more at observing what is going on with the mempool rather than ways it could potentially be changed in the future.. although some of us could hang onto (or even continue to create) some of our smaller UTXOs if we consider that in the future there might be economical ways to spend them.
my posts are about the mempool stuff and considerations of things that can affect mempool utility to make things better for bitcoiners.. and asking about your suggestions and WHO they benefit more inregatds to access, utility and ease of use of the mempool and onchain usage
and of that bloated paragraph all i seen is you want people to avoid bitcoin and instead play on other systems.. doesnt sound like bitcoin adoption to me sounds like bitcoin off-boarding, bitcoin avoidance, bitcoin rejection
just remember to ask yourself if you are not owning funds on your key.. WHO IS? then realise those teaching you that pushing people into other systems sound good.. are the ones that want to own the coins whilst passing off other system balance to people.. knowing those people wont be able to claim bitcoin thus spend down the crap balance to zero and the centralised entity keeps the actual bitcoin
anyways
there are a multitude of ways to get bitcoin fee's down and tx counts up ON THE BITCOIN NETWORK. here ill mention a few
a. a fee formulae that only penalises spammers and bloaters where their formulae score for priority makes them pay more to be accepted into a block and where leaner users not spending hourly get to use cheap base rates that are not multiplied
b. leaner transactions to allow more transactions per block so individually each user pays less whilst more tx per block means pools get nice totals
b1. close the exploits that allow 1tx to take up 4mb
b2. new tx formats that are even shorter(leaner) than standard transactions (yep its possible)
c. uncludge the current 4mb format to not be a 1mb wall and 3mb witness wall. and instead a united 4mb space for better tx count utility
d. then scale blocks to allow even more transactions. so that more users can transact reasonably without being provoked to pay more due to stupid exploits, and bad economic policy made by dev politics that favour off boarding bitcoiners off the network
all things in my previous post quote above help people be on the network and have their transactions not purged from mempool
so lets reign this topic back into mempool observations
whos considerations about ~"
solutions"~ help who the most.. poor or elite
and no dont start shouting the extremist bandwagon strawmen buzzwords of "bigblocker" where you being around long enough to have learned about bitcoin enough, so should know better by now.. would pretend to not know about bitcoin but strangely know all the scripted chants that try to avoid talking about scaling solutions that are not about "bigblocker" extremes. just to avoid talking about scaling solutions and instead just want to turn this topic into an advert of avoiding having transactions seen in mempools or filtered into blocks to want people to leave the bitcoin network