Gambling an activity for fun also has the chance to turn someone's fortune. Calculated risk when taken in gambling can be the way to big wins from gambling. Who do you think should take more risk in gambling? The rich gambler or the gambler who is not yet rich. If a rich gambler takes risks in gambling, they are risking losing money and becoming poor from gambling, or getting richer, when a gambler who is not yet rich gambles, they can also get poorer or richer, so the gambler who should take the risk should be the gambler who can handle the dangers of the risk like losing too. When a rich gambler loses from taking a risk, there is a better chance of them being in a position to manage with the losses, than someone struggling financially who a big loss will really affect. So, I am confused after asking myself this question and answering it, does this mean a poor gambler should continue to play it safe in gambling? With no risk, how can a poor gambler change their fortune in gambling?
Gambling is same risk for everyone no matter who poor or who rich. Because of this gambling should always be used as fun. If you think that poor people should take more risk because if they win then they will win big and become rich. Then it will never be fun it will be gambling for income. One who makes such a plan will become addicted to gambling and suffer a lot. So I can't support the op's plan. no one should take high gambling risk no matter he is rich or poor