Anyone else find it a funny coincidence that the BSV user agrees with franky1?
Common goals are common, methinks.
Best of luck to anyone who thinks they can achieve global adoption of a single blockchain without utilising off-chain technology or totally centralising the entire network. Your task is laughably implausible.
Your definition of centralisation ? The problem is that you think that your node plays a significant role in the network . Well , guess what , it doesn't . Ordinals etc shows exactly that . Luke et al understand that only pool level matters , seems that you didn't get that yet . Decentralisation doesn't come from number of nodes , but from economic terms . If you try to understand how network works you will come to a eureka moment at some point . Ofcourse , after 8 years of LN development you still can't understand that it can't work in a massive scale , so i don't expect that to happen in this life

.
You are great at labeling people , not a strange thing for a cult member . Any real arguments ? Even LN devs stand with my position that LN doesn't work .
Good luck with your LN trying to solve an NP hard problem

.
I hope that people in here see that you have nothing to add to the discussion other than personal insults . But that's what bitcointalk has become , a place to earn money by writing rubbish about others and becoming a "respected" member by providing nothing . People like you and your cult have forced many really respected members to leave this place and never come back . Seems that me , franky and some others are too stubborn to let you poison the newbies with nonsense . Our common is that we love bitcoin even if we disagree on parts while you love anything other than it .