@OP i think that you too biased to listen what he says . That's why you and others laughing with what he says . That's the reason most of the community thinks he's an incompetent liar . He might be a liar but he's not incompetent . As i said in an earlier post he is one of the people with the deeper knowledge about bitcoin . But no one wants to hear what he says . Try to be unbiased and you will understand that he has right in many spots .
I was neutral to Craig being Satoshi until he continually proves he's not time and time again. Currently there's zero verifiable evidence of Craig being Satoshi yet hundreds of documents proving he's a fraud. You seem to want me to remain neutral despite the overwhelming evidence that suggest otherwise. Should I remain neutral to Craig having a time machine to collect a notepad proven to be from the future?
As you know his opponents ( AVP , Lopp etc ) were saying that he doesn't even have diplomas . Does he give you that impression ? Do you think he is/was a forensics expert? Do you think he lies about his contribution of CHFI book written in 2007 ? Did the lawyer question his diplomas ? Has he debunk the blacknet project that AVP says is imaginary ?
What i mean is that the guy is not someone incompetent as presented by his enemies . He is a knowledgeable guy in many fields . Is he a liar ? Well , that's what courts are for .
His qualifications seem to either be non-existent or at best obtained via plagiarism, so therefore his qualifications are useless, not that qualifications mean anything anyway. The real Satoshi could be a high school drop out for all we know. Craig seems to get these qualifications purely as a way to bolster his credibility, when in fact they do the opposite when he's obtained them through fraud.
Another thing i'd like to point is that meta/facebook was a part of copa . Did that sound right for you ? Was zuck/facebook interested for the good of bitcoin ? Jack/ex twitter too ? These two guys are the real form of "big brother" of the internet and suddenly decided to "help" bitcoin , hooray . At least zuck decided to move back 1 year before his platinum membership expires and leave copa . Strange coincidence .
Shouldn't you be remaining neutral to Meta/Facebook's involvement. I'm sure Meta's involvement is financial to ensure bitcoin and blockchain tech remains free to use, but I don't care either way. I'm just glad someone with very deep pockets is involved so COPA can afford to keep Craig in court for as long as it takes.
Charles Sturt University has confirmed they never handed Craig a PHD:
Reports that Australian Dr Craig Steven Wright is probably Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, now appear less than convincing. This is thanks to inconsistencies that may have have been perpetuated by the man himself, as well as proof of technical fakery linked to Wright or someone trying to concoct a remarkable hoax.
Indeed, Wright may be no Dr at all. His now-wiped LinkedIn page (you can still read the extensive profile here) suggested he had a PhD in computer science with Sydney's Charles Sturt University (CSU). But a statement sent to FORBES today from the university said it had never handed Wright any PhD. "Mr Wright has not been awarded a PhD from CSU," the statement read.
That might not seem crucial, but when one looks at what Wright claimed to have studied as part of that PhD - economics, financial modelling - it becomes a lot more suspicious. Did Wright want to make it appear that he had a strong background in computing and finance, two areas that certainly would have helped him come up with ideas for a cryptocurrency?
The statement confirmed Wright was handed three qualifications from the university: Master of Networking and Systems Administration, Master of Management (Information Technology), and Master of Information Systems Security.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/12/11/bitcoin-creator-satoshi-craig-wright-lies-hoax/Not to mention he's also been caught plagiarising content from his degrees obtained from CSU:
https://medium.com/@paintedfrog/craig-wright-plagiarized-significant-portions-of-his-phd-thesis-and-tried-to-hide-it-80cd8f01459And also Northumbria University:
https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2020/05/11/craig-wrights-doctoral-thesis-being-investigated-for-plagiarism/The second time was to highlight Wright as the poster child for cryptocurrency’s plagiarism problem. There, we highlighted how Wright, despite making strong stands against plagiarism in the past, has faced nearly a dozen allegations of plagiarism in his work, including his dissertation that earned him his Master of Laws degree from Northumbria University.
Craig is the very definition of a charlatan. He cannot achieve anything so resorts to fantasy and fraud.
@OP i think that you too biased to listen what he says . That's why you and others laughing with what he says . That's the reason most of the community thinks he's an incompetent liar . He might be a liar but he's not incompetent . As i said in an earlier post he is one of the people with the deeper knowledge about bitcoin . But no one wants to hear what he says . Try to be unbiased and you will understand that he has right in many spots .
There are many instance where he lacks technical knowledge though. For example, proving he can code by copy-paste hello world[1]. And in his settlements offer, he even mistook name of full node software as name of crypotcurrency[2].
I just wish COPA would pull out a laptop, sit it in front of Craig and tell him to code bitcoin from scratch and see what he comes up with. I'd be very surprised if he could come up with something even remotely feasible.