There is something else I would like to discuss.
As you know, a signature campaign is a type of advertising that is shown under a member's profile through discussions in various sections of the forum without explicit indication. And I have never forced anyone to mention or recommend an advertised project directly in posts as this should be voluntary.
But today, as a manager, I was extremely outraged because I observed a situation where a user wears a Wasabi signature, and recommended other open source wallets.
After advertising for mixers was banned here on the forum, payout rates began to decline due to lack of competition, but Wasabi decided to be understanding and respectful of the contributions of quality posters while maintaining a high level of rates. At the very least this deserves respect.
I don’t mind at all if you recommend this or that wallet as long as you list the list of available options. But if you recommend open source wallets without mentioning the one whose advertisement you are wearing, then you have no place on my team, since I see this as a disparaging attitude towards my work and the advertised project.
I will respond to similar incidents in the future.
It is clear what you are pointing to, I support this position.
At the same time, it is certainly complicated to include Wasabi in a discussion without the self-invitation of a couple of trolls who will derail the discussion by repeating the same mantra.
ANN thread, preferably self-moderated, is still necessary. I hope that you will find a model that will make it functional.