[edited out]
... so when I say there's an exception, what I simply mean is that, with the facts gathered from both present and past events, the probabilities assigned to Bitcoin acting differently from it's past performances. Considering those probabilities as certainty is the risk involved in Investment. Without the risks, there won't be any rewards.
Of course, we can invest into bitcoin in a way in which we are not putting all of our eggs in the one basket, but still come out of the situation very much better than we would have had been if we had not invested, and I am not even suggesting to invest into anything other than bitcoin and having your shit together in regards to your cashflows, expenses, emergency fund, reserves and float, and since bitcoin is such an asymmetric bet, many of us should be able to prosper quite well by just attempting to invest as aggressively as we can without recking ourselves.
Surely a problem with poor people is that they do not have very much discretionary income, and maybe they have troubles to be able to increase their discretionary income, and even though they still will benefit from a bitcoin system, they will benefit even more personally if they can figure out ways to increase their discretionary income so that they can invest into bitcoin without recking themselves..... so the balance is not easy for some one who is poor and just getting into bitcoin with $10 per week or something like that because it can take a decently long time to build up a BTC stash when the investment amount is so low.. even though surely we can see those who invested $10 per week over the
past 10 years did end up doing quite well with maybe more than $5k invested and maybe more than 4.5 BTC currently.., even if it might not have had been very clear whether an ongoing $10 per week investment would end up paying off.. and surely the earlier years of investing had more compounding effects in terms of the value appreciation of the BTC purchases.