My understanding is that did not happen and from what I can by reading posts in this thread, it is not disputed either. What does however seem to have taken place was something different. icopress did not ask anybody to make posts containing fake-positive comments, he asked for common sense to prevail in circumstances when it obviously should.
I have only good things to say about icopress and I respect him, but I dont want to see members wearing signature to always write fake positive stuff about service they promote.
I know it is hard to understand that he is not in any way trying to make it as a compulsion or mandatory where every sig member must write good about the wallet they are promoting, to my greatest knowledge what he is also trying to do is for them (participants) to give a little credit or lift about the wallet they are advertising at least to make people feels comfortable about it. I know out of 100 percent of sig participants only few that has tested that service, so that is why they aren't comfortable with it or could find it very difficult to list them among the open source wallet because they haven't test the service before. I could remember the case of mixer where they runs a review and test campaign and many people will give their points they finds while using the service at this point it makes anyone using that service to be more comfortable and easily listed it for people who is needing their services.