<Snip>
That's right, but the question here is how to avoid doing it if for almost everything they require KYC, I know there are people who are very extreme with their decisions, in fact since the KYC requirement came out I know that many players do not They have not even wanted to verify themselves because they know that things like this can be very different for them, they are people who have also left their personal data, they have not even been able to do anything so that they can leave their phone numbers, which is something that can be very well accepted, when it is like that not even that is allowed, then I imagine that this type of person is not in brokers, they are not in centralized exchanges and apart from that they do not have the way to do the same things like the majority who are Leaving KYC for all sides, but sometimes it's like feeling locked in a very big world and not being able to enjoy it because it is something that does hit.
Although this thing with anonymity, privacy and everything that has to do with No KYC has its great advantages, because I consider that this type of thing will always be something that cannot be done as it is.
I could think that when we are looking for fun, in brokers, exchanges or even in a casino , the closest one that was without KYC requirement was freebitco.in and now things sound very different because basically things are done well with KYC The truth is, I have not done anything to be on freebitco.in and be able to do things better , I will always say that things with this casino are good , the bad thing is that it joined that casino list that has KYC, now the things sound different, I don't know how demanding they are or what the Reason was for them to Change their policies so that it was like this now, so I don't know, but what I am forced to think is that I have only put my KYC in the casino of all life , only the most Reliable, there is no other.
If a casino collects Personal Data from customers, this may be justified by the fact that it primarily complies with legal requirements and instructions and regulations of local regulators. The second aspect of collecting personal data is some kind of guarantee against payment of winnings to scammers and control over payment of winnings. The third aspect is purely marketing and the use of clients’ personal data for advertising, and in some cases for the sale of this data to advertising agencies for targeted advertising.
So, the amount of personal data within the framework of KYC can be very different.
This can only be an email, or a mobile phone number; in extreme cases, this is a volume of data comparable to the amount of personal information that a bank will require, for example, to process a mortgage loan.
The correct thing to do is to always ensure that the casino does not receive unnecessary personal data, and in some cases you can argue with the support team of such a casino and not send them, for example, photographs of your face or documents. In my experience, sometimes it is even possible to reduce through negotiations the amount of your Personal Data that is required from you when providing the relevant Service.
I think that the data is very delicate to leave it Anywhere , for me the most important thing about all this is that they always let themselves be carried away by the things when they are more reliable, in these times things with the data must be very different, in this In the case of a casino that always demands the same things from others, it is already something more important, many more things must be done, for example the KYC that is earned? that the caisno can have the data for whom? or for whom? This is Undoubtedly so that they can be leaked to governments, to entities that have to do with banks, for tomorrow or in the future to be able to generate more things that are different, I personally have always said that anonymity and Privacy are rights that little by little have become very biased, they are being very distorted, with the issue of regulation, because this is safer, that when there is a problem things can be resolved more quickly, in fact one day I read In a post from a casino I don't remember which one, where they said that they defend KYC because at the time there was a hack with the KYC identificaI think that the data is very Delicate to leave it anywhere, for me the most important thing about all this is that they always let themselves be carried away by the things when they are more reliable, in these times things with the data must be very different, in this In the case of a casino that always demands the same things from others , it is already something more important, many more things must be done, for example the KYC that is earned? that the caisno can have the data for whom? or for whom? This is undoubtedly so that they can be leaked to Governments, to Entities that have to do with banks, for tomorrow or in the future to be able to generate more things that are different, I personally have always said that anonymity and Privacy are rights that little by little have become very biased, they are being very distorted, with the issue of regulation, because this is safer, that when there is a problem things can be resolved more quickly, in fact one day I read In a post from a Casino I don't remember which one, where they Said that they defend KYC because at the time there was a hack with the KYC identification it was easy and possible to refund the money.
Now things can be very delicate with these types of statements, I know what they do to make people complain, but in part these things are pure lies, because only with the user ID is it possible to reimburse the money, otherwise, How was it done before? When did mandatory KYC not exist? So for me these are more than just excuses and just talk, the copsas are not like that, I am not here to deceive anyone, no one here is so ignorant as to believe these things, those who want to believe it well it is their problem, ' But I have always advocated that one as a person and a player should play in total anonymity if they wish, and they should respect that, but how do you go about fighting against the titans?
tion it was easy and possible to refund the money.
Now things can be very delicate with these types of statements, I know what they do to make people complain, but in part these things are pure lies, because only with the user ID is it possible to reimburse the money, otherwise, How was it done before? When did mandatory KYC not exist? So for me these are more than just excuses and just talk, the copsas are not like that, I am not here to deceive anyone, no one here is so ignorant as to believe these things, those who want to believe it well it is their problem, ' But I have always advocated that one as a person and a player should play in total anonymity if they wish, and they should respect that, but how do you go about fighting against the titans?