Craig couldn't even explain two simple bits of code within bitcoin nor did he know what the code did. He didn't know what 'static const unsigned int' was.
He must have had some serious brain damage, and must have forgotten that he had "written" all the following lines himself back in 2009! 
Code: (main.h)
static const unsigned int MAX_SIZE = 0x02000000;
Code: (market.h)
static const unsigned int nFlowthroughRate = 2;
Code: (net.h)
static const unsigned int PUBLISH_HOPS = 5;
But, I know. How can I prove it's the "original v0.1"?! Let's dive into the BSV repository.
Code: ("bitcoin-tx.cpp")
static const unsigned int minTxOutSz = 9;
static const unsigned int maxVout = MAX_TX_SIZE_CONSENSUS_AFTER_GENESIS / minTxOutSz; // bitcoin-tx tool can build txs with more vouts than pre Genesis nodes would accept
static const unsigned int maxVout = MAX_TX_SIZE_CONSENSUS_AFTER_GENESIS / minTxOutSz; // bitcoin-tx tool can build txs with more vouts than pre Genesis nodes would accept
Code: ("bloom.h")
static const unsigned int MAX_BLOOM_FILTER_SIZE = 36000; // bytes
static const unsigned int MAX_HASH_FUNCS = 50;
static const unsigned int MAX_HASH_FUNCS = 50;
Code: ("compressor.h")
static const unsigned int nSpecialScripts = 6;
(And an endless list of other files that include static const unsigned ints)[/size ]Maybe Craig should now fine the person who made all these "changes" in BSV's source code without his knowledge!