Craig couldn't even explain two simple bits of code within bitcoin nor did he know what the code did. He didn't know what 'static const unsigned int' was. According to Arthur Van Pelt 'unsigned integer' was used over 500 times in the original bitcoin code 
. It was at this point I think they should have just called off the trial and told him to get out. Craig really should have spent more time learning to code or at least memorising it instead of wasting his time with phony degrees and worthless patents.
. It was at this point I think they should have just called off the trial and told him to get out. Craig really should have spent more time learning to code or at least memorising it instead of wasting his time with phony degrees and worthless patents. This by itself means anyone who still believes Wright's claims should feel deep humiliation, as it's beyond obvious by this point that they've been taken for fools. Anyone who claims to be satoshi, but can't explain what satoshi's code does is undeniably a fraud. And it's permanently on record now for all the world to see. No one can come up with a justifiable excuse as to how the real satoshi wouldn't be capable of answering that question. Ergo, he isn't satoshi. That's all the evidence any rational person should need.
The charade is over.