Re: Where do we draw a line? Signature campaigns or shilling campaigns
No matter the excuses/reasons he has given as an attempt as justification, I am unsure as to what the actual reason is for his unprovoked attack on you. I cannot be the only member baffled by his bizarre behaviour. Clearly he applied to join your campaigns many times: Ninjastic 1 and Ninjastic 2 therefore the main theory is him being upset at you not selecting him to join.
The fact your offered him $1000 to provide the name of the member he made claims about, yet he ignored you, shows he is lying in the hope of bringing negativity to your name because he cannot provide a name, the incident did not happen.
Btw, the funny thing is that you lie even about the fact that you didn’t lie.
Therefore, I decided to pay you $1000 in bitcoins if you name the person who was removed from the campaign for the reason you refer to. But if this person says that this is a lie, then you undertake not to participate in any campaign for the next three months. I think this is an excellent agreement considering that you only need to give a “name” to back up your words. Then the next time you want to soak me in shit you will have more arguments.
The fact your offered him $1000 to provide the name of the member he made claims about, yet he ignored you, shows he is lying in the hope of bringing negativity to your name because he cannot provide a name, the incident did not happen.
Use ninjastic.space and see how many times you have applied. I don't care much about this, but I can't find any other reasonable explanation for why you are deliberately spreading slander. In any case, this whole dialogue no longer makes any sense because you wrote such a long post, but did not bother to say “one” main word.
That was a really cute neutral feedback you just left 
. Birth of another troll? Malicious slander? Laughable comments...and the fact is that if it were true, the feedback would be red...and if you left a red, the reliability of your trust would be in question because the fact is that my comments are based on true & recent events. [..]
You are right, this tag is really good, because it most accurately describes the situation where you were caught by your tongue. Malicious slander differs from ordinary lies in that in the first case you go around the forum and spread lies in threads that have nothing to do with the original discussion, lies that can easily be refuted by the available facts. But the tag will definitely change to red if you do this systematically.. Birth of another troll? Malicious slander? Laughable comments...and the fact is that if it were true, the feedback would be red...and if you left a red, the reliability of your trust would be in question because the fact is that my comments are based on true & recent events. [..]Btw, the funny thing is that you lie even about the fact that you didn’t lie.
Therefore, I decided to pay you $1000 in bitcoins if you name the person who was removed from the campaign for the reason you refer to. But if this person says that this is a lie, then you undertake not to participate in any campaign for the next three months. I think this is an excellent agreement considering that you only need to give a “name” to back up your words. Then the next time you want to soak me in shit you will have more arguments.
See this thread where a member got kicked from their campaign just for recommending another wallet instead of the wallet that was being advertised in their signature. [...]