I'm not sure where you get your sources from, but that is completely false about them not being able to revert the self-exclusion ban. Are you saying that there is a user datatable that CANNOT be tampered with manually whatsoever? Well, if you were implying that you would be wrong. Databases can most definitely be tampered with, it's just how it works.
What if a rogue moderator self-excluded the top players at Rollbit? You think they wouldn't find a way to undo it? It's not impossible to do and likely wouldn't affect Rollbit in anyway.
Anyways, the self-exclusion is irrelevant at this point. I'm not here to argue about just that. There's plenty more points I made and proof to back up my accusations.
You're saying that you know for sure that it can be reverted? Self-exclusion? Do you mind to provide a supporting evidence for it? Because if it can and they do [and that you can prove it], it's a very wrong procedure and against the gambler protect policy.
As for your situation of rogue moderator, that's not self-exclusion, that's a mod-ban, a temporary ban. And yes, that can be reversed because that is an act of a moderator, it's an action taken as a result of a violation [suppose the ban is justified] by a player against a policy or --as you said-- a rogue moderator unjustifiedly acted on his own. But for the case of
exclusion, be it a self-exclusion or because the staff detects signs of gambling addiction, that should not be able to be tampered and reversed before the period runs out because it is a procedure to create a safe and responsible gambling.
Those two situations, the ban by mods and exclusion, are two completely different situations. And no, it is relevant because it is one of the point of your accusation, that they can or can not [or rather, will or will not] tampering with exclusion.