Have you ever tried something like this situation before?
I can not try it because I can not be stupid like the man. I am talking about Michael Cartlidge.
So what is your thoughts on this, 50/50 good for you or nah?
No evidence that the man is telling the truth. No evidence also that the woman is telling the truth. But that woman has the legal right to the money won.
Will you insist to have an ego battle if you are on the same situation?
If truly the man, Michael Cartlidge sent the money to Charlotte Cox (his girlfriend) that was used to win the huge amount of money.