I believe that this is part of the dissatisfaction expressed in the Telegram group. Some are not satisfied with your work but still do not want to lose their position in future campaigns. Anonymous anti-campaign is always the answer to such a thing.
Regardless, I believe that you should have found a better way to handle the disputed issue.
If that is about the recent Telegram post made by a user for Sherbet Signature Campaign then it make sense. Even though my term clearly stats that if the payment is not in the escrow wallet then I am not liable to pay any of the participants, I still gave him the opportunity to receive his payment.
I don't want to work with haters, bad actors, impatient members who do not trust and understand the business. I can not always pay campaign payments out of my pocket if a campaign does not pay me for the participants. I can only can give a good amount of time to the management team to send the payment and by that time if they don't then the only thing I can do is to create a scam accusation against them and ask the community to support a flag.
The guy is a coward and greedy. Obviously he does not want to lose his opportunity to work in my campaigns or he would already PMed me his payment address so that I could pay him and get rid of him.