Now, here is the conundrum.... do we justify exploiting casinos and taking away from their profits, because they might be exploiting their employees?
Are casino employees really exploited? I don't think so.
In my personal experience, I worked for casinos in the past, 5 years in one casino and 1 year in another casino, and never felt exploited by them, the deal was 8h/day and 6days/week, but the payment wasn't bad, so, it was a nice job and fair deal for all.
Let's even assume that casino employees are exploited, is that a justification enough for someone else outside the casino to exploit the casino? I think "No" is the right answer, I personally can maybe understand if..
1. The casino exploited is actually exploiting her employees
2. That the person who carried out the exploit on the casino is an employee of the same casino.
Anything else outside of this is absolutely no justification at all.
Is this not also hurting the employees? Those profits ends up paying the employee salaries and bonuses and overtime.
The fact that the casino loses a big amount doesn't hurt employees, it doesn't mean they will earn less. It only hurt the casino owners who have to wait sometime to recover that part of the bankroll.
[/quote]
Well, I would say that it depends on how big the casino is, and what type of employees the casino have, when a small and growing casino is exploited, the owners might have to lay off some workers in order to cut down on expenses for a quicker recovery, those workers layed are surely not going to be happy even if they are paid their full salary before letting them go.