however, my question here now is : is gambling restricted to some certain kind of individuals or class? or is there any stratification when it comes to playing gambling ?please your opinions here here will actually quench my curiosity.
This assumption is not because they play certain games or because they come from the lower middle class, but because gambling is always considered a bad thing, even when someone commits a bad act and is known to be a gambler, society will immediately associate it with their gambling habits even though the reason for their bad actions could be something else and that's people who will only judge from the surface, they will see what is visible without ever considering anything else.
In addition, media reports that sometimes do not detail the bad things about gambling increasingly make people agree that gambling is a bad thing, even though of the many who gamble there may be those who have bad behavior, but those who remain good human beings are of course also many, because they gamble just for fun and are responsible for their gambling.
Society's one-dimensional perspective of gambling is the problem. Everything is about surface judgements, as you said. People see what they want. Gambling becomes blamed if someone stumbles after betting. A culture that won't look further uses it as a scapegoat
The media? Don't start. Selling stories, not truths. They'll simplify a difficult topic like gambling and call it the foundation of all evil. Top-notch sensationalism. What they won't tell you: Guess what? Money management, risk assessment, and self-control are essential life skills. Gamblers that bet responsibly master these skills
It's time to accept that gambling, like any other human activity, is neutral. Individuals and their choices shape the story. Please stop demonising the many for the crimes of a few. Isn't it hypocritical to criticise harshly when we all take risks?