<Snip>
That's the bad thing, when the people are biased from this right, all for what? a control, that's all it's based on is a control that's not at all Simple, this has to do a lot with these things to be able to do them better, if we can do any kind of thing, it's just that the Things come to an end when a person demands information in a casino, for example, why don't they buy a coin like Monero? Even though you already have your KYC ready and everything, because at least they had these methods everything would be better, but no, the thing is that when the money leaves the casino, Monero provides anonymity, privacy and makes it almost impossible to trace , Governments and entities in charge find it very difficult to track this Money , so why do they allow this ? Is something so difficult?
.....
In my opinion, the situation is as follows.
With all due respect to Monero, I must say that it is now becoming more and more difficult to use this coin. First of all, I mean the fact that both Monero and other privacy coins are increasingly becoming the object of study by law enforcement agencies and their use immediately begins to indirectly, but negatively affect the person using them. The second aspect that also does not contribute to their spread is the fact that the increase in the rate of confidential coins in relation to Bitcoin and Ethereum and coins such as Solana or Cardano is proceeding at a slower pace. This is clearly visible, for example, in the way Monero dropped quite significantly in the CMC or Coingecko rankings in the first hundred coins by their capitalization. It turns out that holding Monero simply becomes unprofitable. So I don't expect them to become widespread in the future. Including among gamblers in crypto casinos.