without moh salah the creativity and variety of liverpool's attack is slightly reduced. only against a weak team notingham forest was made difficult to score goals. for whatever reason the opponent applies negative football this means super devensif. but nottingham forest is a weak team, unless the opponent is a strong team and the opponent does defensive football difficulty scoring goals is normal but this is only against a weak team nottingham forest.
Although his presence could potentially bring about significant changes in the situation, it doesn't always translate into the desired outcome from the game. I hope that you should be aware of how nottingham forest consistently defending. Their target was not winning against liverpool but 1 point from getting draw against it. Nottingham was almost made it but it's bottling the game through nunez's heading. It was a shitty moment for sure to all of nottingham fans but since nunez was able scoring at the last minute and nottingham forest should let one point go away from club's hand. This is a shitty strategy that was always making the offensive club struggled to get the points.
If it used against chelsea and im sure nottingham forest will be getting three points since chelsea was always playing so awfully when it faced the defensive strategy like this. No doubt that if liverpool tried so hard to score.
It's caused by the club has no chance other than doing it. it's a shitty result for forest and im sure about this but the blunder happened in the last minute cost the club a lot.
I was watching that moment and i can only feel amaze with it. The performance from nottingham forest was good even though it was only defending and then counter attacking.