Do you think a celebrity who turns down a multi-million dollar deal solely because the organization doesn't allow him smoking weed is a reckless financial decision?
It depends on their perspective because in the end it's not just about financial issues but there could be priorities that come first.
So when their habits are restricted such as not smoking or not drinking alcohol in an agreement but they are cigarette and alcohol addicts I think they will definitely reject it outright because after all when someone who already has an addiction problem to something it will definitely be a little complicated if it is abandoned.
Regardless of whether it is reckless management or not I think in the end it depends on the choice that is made because forcing to follow the rules but in the end it hurts themselves I think it is also not a good deal.
Everyone has a different point of view and situation to decide on this so I guess it comes down to each person's choice in the end.