As Helena Yu has already guessed, this thread had to do with a "vouch" from a trusted member buwaytress. I wanted honest opinions from everyone of their interpretation of the word as a certain situation was unfolding that has now calmed. Either way I feel it's a teaching moment for everyone because sometimes actions may have consequences.
Hello.
I'm the member who'll vouch for OP's authenticity. I know him personally. He is a gambler with significant member levels in crypto casinos. Newly introduced to bitcointalk. I was the one who asked him to sign up to the forum.
OP wagers heavy, on favourable deposit conditions offered to him at casinos thanks to his membership levels. Those bonuses help him with his strategy. My understanding is he takes on a certain risk exposure, which he has collateral for elsewhere, but has limited capacity to free it up quickly because of fiat concerns.
What I am not doing with this "vouch" is providing any form of guarantee or taking any responsibility for potential deals. My vouch is purely on OP's authenticity, as a personal favour. This is not advice to take him up on his offer. Gambling is high-risk. OP balances that with his favourable conditions, but it doesn't eliminate risk.
All conditions would be up to potential takers to negotiate directly with OP. I recommend a brief but clear contractual agreement to cover specifics such as timeline, payments, and what happens in the event OP loses that deposit.
buwaytress was just helping his friend out and left a disclaimer he isn't offering any form of guarantee. Problem is potential lenders may not see it that way. Not telling everyone not to vouch for someone, but be prepared to accept consequences if something should happen because of your words.